Yesterday saw one last quick game. Really it deserves a full telling and narrative but not only was I tired but I was called away several times by duties as jack of all. Now, the memories are fast fading and the pictures too few and too poor so this will be a quick "fare thee well till we meet again" post for the 54's. Don't worry, they'll be back well before Christmas.
Its been 5 1/2 years since my Britain's engaged in battle at Hook's Farm and it seemed like as good a scenario as any to close the month with.
The Canadian and US forces meet again at the site of Hook's Trading Post and Firely Mission. Each side having by arrangement a General, 2 Colonels, 2 cavalry, 6 infantry, and a gun. |
Another old fluctuating choice beckons as well. When I started in 54's around 1995, I wrote a set of 1 stand = a unit rules but got drawn into Old School singles for Colonial's and for the War of 1812. Ever since I've felt the pull back to one base units and its strong now. I like knocking figures over for photos for a while but eventually the novelty wears off. With small units, not only does it look odd to me to have a single figure left as a functioning unit and not only are stands easier to deploy and clear away and less prone to damage but I just have this odd irrational attraction to the idea of Permanence that a fixed and labelled stand has. A neat contrast of Permanence for toys, things which are usually considered Impermanent by nature. A question for later.
Summer is over (ok not technically). Autumn is coming! (We have more than 2 season here..)
Now that E Troop has been blooded, I am sure they will perform as well as they look.
ReplyDeleteCanadians will fight hard for whiskey, that much is clear. :)
But obviously not as much as the Irish, in 2 separate games the Canadians have failed to seize the whisky stores from the Irish. Maybe they're beer drinkers?
DeleteHi Ross,
ReplyDeleteHere in Kleveland we have 4 seasons: Almost Winter, Winter, Still Winter, and Construction.
I too share the stand-based preference. Sometimes I wonder if it's because, taking the rules from the two ground-breaking sets in 1962, Featherstone and Morschauser, I would rather play Morschauser -- even though I prefer Don's writing style and I own over a dozen of his wargaming and history books, which I re-read every few years for inspiration. Go figure.
Regards,
John
I read a lot of Featherstone but by the time I had enough figures painted up and found an opponent I was on to WRG Ancients and multifigure bases. So that seems sort of natural.
DeleteIt was not quite 20 years ago that I got hooked on Volley & Bayonet with its 1 stand bases after seeing some of Frank Chadwick's 54mm SYW and ACW units and then did my own.
John,
DeleteI have become a real a Morschauser supporter over the years. I think that he was way ahead of his time, and even today his rules feel very modern and up to date.
All the best,
Bob
Ross Mac,
ReplyDeleteIts a great scenario and it really cries out to be used with your collection. Yet another great battle report ... and it was nice to see your latest troops in action.
All the best,
Bob
Thanks Bob, a rather cursory report but sometimes that's good too.
DeleteI didn't think youd have much hope of clearing the irish from the whiskey store.
ReplyDeleteI didn't plan to let them near it but somehow they found the way.
DeleteNice batrep, glad to see someone's fighting for a good cause...whiskey!
ReplyDelete