________________________________________
The Rebel army marches out to face the foe. |
"The retreat from Duck River was a bit of a shambles but I managed to pull the army together at the little town of Sittington on the banks of the fast flowing Blutaip River. With the Red Queen's forces hot on our tail, the best plan seemed to be to cross over and then blow the bridge which was the only crossing point within 50 squares for an army with all of its supplies.
Before I could issue the orders though, word came that the army's supplies had not yet been evacuated from the depot in Sittington as ordered. Those supplies were crucial for the continued existence of the Rebel army and so I had no choice but to order the men to prepare for battle. We had to buy time to evacuate the vital munitions.
McAlpine's Fusiliers get to work with axe and shovel on some field fortifications as the advance guard pulls back. |
We had a narrow gap to hold and that would make it hard for the enemy to use his superior numbers, so it was possible. A probe by enemy Hussars was quickly driven back . As the army deployed, McAlpine and his pioneers were soon busy erecting a hasty redoubt in the centre to make the position even stronger.
With the main army deployed, I ordered the sharpshooters to pullback from LIttle Farmton and move to the left to keep the enemy from moving through the woods and recalled the 3rd Infantry to the main defence line.
The Redcoats have passed through Little Farmington and opened fire on the main line. |
The first enemy assault on our mainline was repulsed easily at all points. There was a pause while they brought up guns and reserves but things were looking good.
A hole in the line! Where are the reserves? |
The line is under heavy pressure. |
The redoubt is over run but McAlpine's falls back in good order. |
Thankfully the Commissary now reported that the stores had been successfully evacuated. All that remained was to save as much of our force as possible then blow the bridge.
Mcalpine's falls back over the bridge. |
There was no way to save the last two infantry units. As the Zouaves fell back over the bridge I gave the order to light the fuse. There was a flash then a terrific BOOM! When the smoke cleared the bridge was still there but it looked mighty shaky. Men might cross it slowly in small parties but no cavalry or guns.
It was enough, but we no longer had an army in being. The retreat continued all that night."
A thoroughly enjoyable game narrative and excellent photos of the tabletop.
ReplyDeleteThanks, it was fun to play.
DeleteA great story and even better collection
ReplyDeleteThank you Grand Duke and best of luck with your
DeleteThe Grand-Duchy of Normandy blog
A fine narrative of a familiar theme.
ReplyDeleteAn oldie but it still works.
DeleteI agree with the gentlemen above. Enjoyable report!
ReplyDeleteThanks, it was fun.
DeleteWell done Ross - a thorough very informative narrative and top notch photos....Happy New Year and Good Health too. Cheers. KEV.
ReplyDeleteThanks Kev.
DeleteA classic—and challenging—scenario, and your report rings true. In the early 80s in a manuever exrecise in Germany I found myself and my armored cavalry platoon in Lannigan’s situation—holding out on the “wrong side” of the bridge at Hof, with similar results.
ReplyDeleteThanks Ed. It is said to have been based on Col Lawford's experience during the retreat from Burma. Considering your experience, playing these scenarios multiple times in different settings does work.
DeleteRoss Mac,
ReplyDeleteWhat great battle report with which to end 2018!
It's a classic scenario that is adaptable to all sorts of period.
All the best,
Bob
Thanks Bob, this and Blasthof Bridge were the 1st 2 scenarios I ever saw.Still good after 47 years.
DeleteA fabulous game report as always.
ReplyDeleteThanks Tim.
DeleteWhat can I say that hasn't been said? Wonderful report and wonderful looking game!
ReplyDeleteThanks John.
DeleteWOW, what a totally superb battle game, and an amazing way to finish up the year. This is so inspiring. May I ask, what scale buildings are you using: they look absolutely perfectly in keeping set against 54mm soldiers. And what size table are you using, it looks to be about 4` square unless I`m much mistaken.. proving the point that 54mm games don't need to take up a ton of space.
ReplyDeleteThanks Stephen. The buildings are not to scale but were built using foamcore to fit my table using an exagerated vertical scale to fit my 40mm figures while still being useable with my 54s. You can see an Oct 2016 blog post on it here: There is still time
DeleteOn and the table is 4'6" x 6' but 4'sq will work well for skirmishes and small actions.
DeleteThanks for the replies Ross. No your buildings and terrain look really great. I`ve long held the belief that once you hit miniatures reach 40mm or above, you actually need to reduce the size of buildings slightly, because properly in scale ones just look too big somehow. You got it just right.
ReplyDelete