My initial intent for the second game was to make a list of six attack/defense scenarios including flank attack options but looking at the situation, one Confederate Divisions driven back down one road with the other two, with the Army Commander, retreating along a different road with a Union division in between them, I decided to just roll up a defensive position (dividing the table into sectors and rolling to see how many, if any, hills, woods etc were in each, adjusted to looj natrual to my eye) with the two roads which were available to the Union merging into one road defended by the main confederate army.
I then added a cross road to allow the third division to rejoin from the flank. Both sides are aware that the other division is out there, marching to rejoin, but not when and not where it will reach the field. Will it appear down the road from the flank or has it marched to join from the Confederate rear?
Ideally I should have recorded precise losses before clearing the table and have had a rule for determining what percentage of losses could be recovered in between battles. However, one joy of solo gaming is that you can change and fudge things in between games if you want so I used a rough count of lost stands and careful perusal of battle photographs to get a good idea of how each division fared and went from there.
Ready to Receive the Enemy Assault |
If the Confederates can hold with their army intact, and force the Federals to withdraw, they will win and a Federal rearguard action will follow.
Any other result will be a draw. In this case, there will either be a renewal of the fight in the morning or else the armies will break contact to regroup, followed by a meeting engagement to decide the campaign. That decision will probably be diced for.
The Calm Before the Storm. |
While it is ideal to use one set of tabletop rules rules for a campaign, I was in the midst of planning a change for my ACW collection, a shift from an Old School approach with Regiments as units to using Brigades as units but I hadn't settled between several choices of rules and organization. My plan had been to stay off grid but with the smaller table and new 5" squares I couldn't resist trying them. It was ok but there were a number of minor issues and my three stand units had to be broken up. I decided to try the other leading alternative so this game will be fought with brigades composed of 6 stands when at full strength but without the grid.
Solo campaigns are a great way to test out rules or rule changes. I am enjoying reading your series of solo wargaming posts.
ReplyDeleteGood to hear. Quid pro quo.
DeleteJust wanted to say that I am really enjoying your solo war-gaming series. Not just a series of AARs, but the though process behind it - Thank you
ReplyDeleteMy pleasure!
DeleteWhich Green Book scenario was this?
ReplyDeleteOh, I could have sworn I had included that, #18 River Crossing. with pontoons instead of boats.
Delete