Turn 6. All troops are on table. The opposing infantry are bickering over the woods. |
However, I had time to clear the table, ready for a new game. Of course, once I packed up the troops it seemed somehow wrong not to act on the idea of refighting the scenario in a different period. The 1950's lads hadn't been out recently....so I broke out The Portable Wargame, had a quick flip through and went at it.
Blue has been pushed back but the tricksy government forces prefer running away to dying for the autocrats while the Rebels seem to preferring dieing for The Cause. |
It was a disaster! What?! Well, maybe not a disaster but things didn't feel right. I reached for the book and checked the design notes, reread the rules more carefully and found my problems. Well, couldn't let it rest there so this morning, I reset and played again.
That is one of the joys of Solo wargaming, you can do 'do-overs'.
The brakes are on! The Rebels are exhausted but they hold the ridge and the enemy has been teetering on the edge of exhaustion for some time now. If they would JUST die instead of falling back! |
The game that followed was not at all like the horse and musket one, except that at the end it was close, not as close but close. The odds of Blue winning outright were probably thinner but if the rather slow witted Blue Commander had been on top of his game, an attack plan that took more account of the rules, such as exhausted armies not being forced to withdraw, thus needing to be pushed off the hill unit by unit, they could have done it. The overly aggressive Red commander might have done better as well if he had focussed more on holding the objective though exhausting the enemy worked once those who had made it onto the ridge were forced back or destroyed. Of course if the random unit chart had offered up 2 tanks instead of 2 anti-tank guns, that would have helped too!
OK, NOW I'm ready to clear the table and start a 3 game linked scenario solo minicampaign.
54's, ACW, 16thC or Medievel Fantasy? Hmm where should we go?
Ross Mac,
ReplyDeleteA great battle report. I had to look twice before I realised that you had used 54mm figures and not 20mm ones ... which only goes to show that you can use the PW rules with larger figures without having to resort to using the floor to play on.
All the best,
Bob
4'x4' table not big enough for 2 metre distancing from my imaginary opponent.
DeleteVery nice Sherman. Any idea what manufacturer it is from?
ReplyDeleteIt was one of the original Classic Toy Soldier 75mm Shermans which had big indents in the side. They sell a better version now but these have done stirling service for 22 years. I paneled over the hollow spot years ago and upgunned them to 76mm last year (with a straw).
DeleteAh ! the old Britains BAT anti tank gun , I have one of those somewhere.
ReplyDeleteAn original, MY original. Its one of the pieces I never let go of.
DeleteAh, nothing like being called into service while the more important gaming activities are forced to be put on hold. I realize assassination may be just too severe, but have you considered staging a coup d'etat? After all, he who has the bigger battalions...
ReplyDeleteSupportively yours,
Chris Johnson
Sometimes its not about numbers.....
DeleteNice 54mm Ross- I do like that Sherman!
ReplyDelete”Of course if the random unit chart had offered up 2 tanks instead of 2 anti-tank guns, that would have helped too!“
ReplyDelete...or to paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, sometimes you have to fight with the army you have rather than the army you’d like to have?
Unbalanced/sub-optimal situations are better in solo than in live opponent play.
A very nice AAR, indeed. You asked for opinions about the next period to be used in a linked campaign. My preference would be for the ACW for no more pressing reason than I really like the period. Hope you are well and COVID-19 free.
ReplyDeleteJerry
Obviously mine would always be Fantasy... though I like seeing the Airfix ACWs getting a run out.
ReplyDeleteGreat toys and cool game, 54mms in a small space,,what’s not to like?
ReplyDelete