Sunday, October 7, 2012

And a game for a Day Off

Its the Thanksgiving Long Weekend here in the Great Red, Yellow, Brown and Green North. Unlike Cousin Johnathon we like to celebrate as soon as the harvest is in. Having recovered some what and it being a holiday I decided to act on my suggestion to replay Friday's game using With MacDuff to the Frontier since those are the rules I have selected for the Atlantica games.

 The opening shots are fired as the Blue army deploys.

As long as I was testing things, I decided to use as many singly based figures as possible. While exchanging units, I noticed that several of the ones I was using had been formed when I was thinking of 10/20 figures per unit so I decided to go with that. The forces ended up being:

Red fielded 1 Brigade with 2 x 20 Infantry (Fusiliers & Veterans), 1 x 10 Light Infantry divided into 2 5 man detachments and 1 field gun with 5 crew. 1 Brigade with 1x10 Irregular Lancers, 1 x 10 Dragoons. Blue fielded a Brigade under General Zinn with 2x20 Infantry, (2nd & 4th) 1 x10 Light Infantry, 1 Pack Artillery Light Gun, 1 Brigade under General St. John with 2 x 20 infantry (Blue Guards & Lafayette County Volunteers), 1 Brigade with 1 x 10 Irregular Cavalry, 1 x 10 Dragoons and 1 Steam Tractor light battery.

 The cavalry suffered from a  small error in designation, "historically" they all deserved a better rating. Since I am trying to differentiate these games from my War of 1812 games, I decided to follow up on a thought from last year and advance the date to the 1850's/60's with rifled muskets.

The plan was the same for both sides as in the HofT game.

The Bangor Boiler Company Steam Battery, belching  fire and smoke out both ends.

The first game started off well, it had that relaxed Toy Soldier feel that I was looking for. But after a couple of turns, things began to feel a bit off. The card sequencing works well for the sort of small actions I played in September and for confused situations but with this sort of open field encounter between organized armies it worked but it didn't feel quite right. That's why I used to officially endorse two play sequence systems. After some thought I switched over to dicing for Initiative. OK thats why I am play testing, its now confirmed that whatever  changes have taken place, both options still have a valid place.

As the game progressed I noticed a few other things that didn't feel right especially the move full and shoot but also the rally, melee casualties amongst cavalry and the melee resolution. For a moment I felt a shadow of disappointment if not downright despair but then I remembered that even though its been  a month,  in game terms, I had not only just resurrected and restructured the rules and that this was the first play test involving an encounter between regular armies but that I had proposed some changes after the last game that hadn't been fully tested yet, including the move full and shoot. It also occurred to me that with 10 man cavalry units perhaps I should form them 2 deep so that they can't lose more than 1/2 their figures in 1 round of melee. Oh. No change needed.

I then spent some time going over the reports and the  discussions after the last games and thinking about the original rules and some of the other things I've learned recently or, more accurately, had reinforced  about how simplifications and omissions  can help improve game flow while achieving the desired feel. Then I spent more time revising the play sequence, shoot & move, melee resolution and morale rules and then I reset the table and started again.

The basic impact of the changes are as follows:

  • units in command control will move if ordered while those out side might not, much like the original but with a simpler control chart since chance cards are supposed to look after that, 
  • units may move 1/2 and shoot but with a penalty, again as in the original while reaction fire is once again limited to Charge reactions,
  • there is no longer any melee resolution, units fight until they break or withdraw, I tried this with HofT and prefer the effect to sometimes wonky win/lose melee rules or post melee morale checks.
  • lastly, there are once again only  two morale states, good or broken and failure to rally a broken unit will see if retreat off table..    

 The action heats up in the final game as Blue's attack degenerates into  a firefight.

The resulting game was just what I had had in mind. It would fall into the smaller class of scenario and took me about 2 hours and what seemed like a lot of turns to play through. the largest game envisaged would have about 3 times the number of units, be hard put to fit on this table and should take a full 4 or 5 hours to play to a conclusion unless there was a time or turn limit.

Now, as to the game. On the left, Blue's infantry stalled in a firefight until first one then the other lead regiments broke. The Blue Guards charged the hill but with some deft dice rolling the Veterans came within a figure of breaking them. The Guards fell back, rallied and took up the firefight as the Lafeyette Volunteers also opened up. The Fusiliers came forward in response and along with the gun broke the Volunteers as well. On the other flank, a first cavalry attack by Blue  had been handily met and repulsed by the Red cavalry. At this point I was ready to call it but the 2nd & 4th Infantry had rallied well and were there to renew the fight. I decided to go the course.

The renewed firefight soon took a nasty course for Red. Having been under fire for a prolonged period with no relief, they were starting to look very shaky when heavy rifle fire broke the gun crew which pulled back to reorganize. At this point  a renewed assault by Blue's cavalry broke the Lancers and almost hit the Fusiliers in the flank. Victory was suddenly up in the air.

A timely initiative win allowed the Fusiliers to face the threat while the Lancers rallied. Colonel Flowerdew  at the head of the Princess Charlotte Dragoons swept away the Light Horse, chased off the Steam Battery and sweeping across the table,  over ran the pack gun and hit the flank of the 4th Infantry. The remaining blue infantry formed square covering the retreat of the 4th and driving off the now blown Dragoons but the squares were in rifle range of Red's infantry and moments later the whole army, now under Brigadier Zinn, the only unwounded Blue commander left on the field,  was heading for home with the tattered remnants of the Blueguard and Light Horse covering their retreat.  .
  Carnage after a close run thing. 
(Disclaimer: No toy soldiers were injured during the playing of this game).

Oh happy day! Atlantica is set. The 20/10 scheme is once again the official plan as are washers for bases and MacDuff for rules. Might have reached that conclusion 5 years ago to be honest if I hadn't been befuddled by organization and basing but then I would have missed the journey. 


  1. I have found that 'card' driven systems work well for skirmish situations. Where the man-to-man feel and the tension of what card comes next adds to the situation.

    Cards can also work well for games where there are less than 4 formations per side - unless there is a 'turn end' card in play - I find them only infuriating, non-game entertaining and non-historical. I agree that, at times, troops will stand about with their thumbs up their butts. It does not ever happen to troops faced with the heat of the battle situation.

    For action involving formations of troops, where one mini is *more* than one man, then initiative gamesmanship is called for. Whether it is a thee-then-me move or a whole side moves then counter-move or more 'chrome' with things like opportunity fire and counter-charges. Similarly for games of the 1-1 mini scale where there are 60+ minis in action per side. Card driven functions just become one more administrative act in an already busy turn sequence.

  2. Hurrah for the widow of Windsor!

    Your commitment to refining your rules Ross never fails to astonish me.

    1. As the length of the process does me. Perhaps if I worked on 1 at a time....

  3. Ross,

    I would like to wish you a most wonderful (and tasty) Canadian Thanksgiving!

    -- Jeff

  4. Ross

    Enjoyed the action. I am planning to take MacDuff into Wascanastan this Friday. Are you changes online now? Will you change them again before next week?


    1. I hope there will be pictures! Its been a while since the last Peshawar Gazette.

      The updated is version is on line. I need to check the optional rules to make sure they fit but that should be it. Best warn the British though, they have those bendy bayonets such as were issued for the Emir's Lair game and are best off relying on firepower to repel the tribesmen.

  5. D Ross,
    You mentioned trying to set a time frame for your game. Why not the period roughly concurrent with the Mexican American War? There will be some rifled muskets although new regiments and militia might have smoothbore muskets, troops might still form square, lancers would still be around - in short all of the elements you seem to want. Just a thought....

    1. Thanks Jerry. That has been the period and a good one it is. With the rebirth of the War of 1812 in 40mm though, there are just too many similarities to feel worth while adding troops to both armies because the hats are wrong. Hence the thought to shift the purely fictional one closer to the Crimea and Indian Mutiny.It'll also give me an excuse to use those Prussians in spiked helmet molds.

  6. Ross Mac,

    I hope that you had a good Thanksgiving Day.

    All the best,


  7. The Bangor steam artillery is just fantastic!

    1. Thanks, I had fun researching early steam vehicles then concocting a plausible armed version in the flesh.

  8. Nice - another great game I'm into Two Hour Wargames myself, but everyone to their own ;)