Thursday, March 14, 2019

MacDuff Counter Attacks


The scenario I chose to play was "Counterattack" from Thomas' One Hour Wargames. The rules were the updated version of With MacDuff to the Frontier. Prince August's series of homecasting moulds  provided the armies.
The Nordmark Naval Regiment stands alone.
The scenario gives "Red"(Maritime Alliance) 1 unit to hold the bridge with 5 more units arriving on turn 3. "Blue" (Rosmark) has 6 units on his baseline. Unknown to Blue (Theoretically - this is where Solo play often requires a bit  of dual personality or at least roleplay.) there are 2 fords, one near each board edge. The winner is the side that holds both bridge and town at the end.

Rather than roll on the 6 unit chart, I prefer to roll twice on the 3 unit chart. That way, there is at least a chance of having an all arms force.

In the event, Blue rolled up 3 infantry, 2 cavalry, and 1 gun while Red rolled up 3 infantry, 1 light infantry, 1 cavalry and 1 gun.

After what felt like an eternity of artillery bombardment, cavalry charges and musket volleys, the Nordmark Naval Regiment was relieved to see the rest of the Alliance forces arrive.
For the last few years MacDuff has offered a choice of activation methods. The new one that works best for straightforward battles is a simple initiative card draw or die roll to see who goes first each turn. The original one which was designed for the confused situations found in frontier skirmishes involved card activation by single units or groups of units under a commander.  I opted for the latter.

The battered Naval Regiment has pulled back into reserve while the Alliance cavalry has met a Rossish cavalry charge and smashed it.

The main thing I wanted to do was to test my newest attempt to get my rally rules working smoothly. The rally rule has caused me  the most problems over the years while also doing exactly what I wanted it to do. At its most basic, the idea back in 1995 was that  not all "hits" were dead and wounded but included all those things that lower a unit's efficiency from men who have frozen up or been temporarily stunned, to disorder and confusion in the ranks to temporary ammo shortages  and so on. Therefore I allowed units to try to recover casualties when the unit rallied. I got a lot of push back from people who could only see wargame casualties as dead and wounded  but that wasn't the problem.

The problem was twofold. One issue was the logistics of tracking an increasing trail of bodies while waiting for a unit to rally and needing to differentiate between those who failed their rally and were out of the game and those who were still waiting for their chance. The second, more important issue, was that successful rally rolls prolonged the game, 5 hours was not unusual for larger games but having to make a decision about who won when time ran out was even more common.




After some fierce fighting the Rosmark forces have been flanked and driven back with heavy losses.
I won't bother trying to list all of the ways I tried to resolve the issues to my satisfaction but eventually I almost gave up altogether. Having a rally phase at the end of each turn simplified the logistics and rolling once for each pair of 'casualties' kept the recover rate reasonable but since rallying and reforming the ranks were tied together in my mind this meant that disorder was almost meaningless as  it was often removed before the enemy could take advantage and almost always removed before it affected the unit's own actions.
An attack by the Rossish reserve regiment has driven the Alliance cavalry back over the ford but Rosmark has taken many more casualties and half of their units have been driven from the field.

Recently, an obvious solution finally occurred to me. All I had to do was separate "reforming", which is an action which is done instead of shooting or moving, from "rallying" which has to do with morale and losses and can be done at the end of each turn and can be at the end of a turn without taking much away from the game.

The Garrison of Smalltown make a brave stand to give the army a chance to escape.

This was the first MacDuff game using the new approach though I used it successfully last week in my non-MacDuff 54mm game. It worked again in this game.  Its not perfect, and sometimes the end of turn rally seems little different from a traditional saving throw made immediately when the hits are taken but if a unit takes hits early in a turn, the difference can be critical  and from a purely "game mechanic" perspective, it works and is close enough to the original idea for me.

7 comments:

  1. I've never really looked into battlefield recovery of stragglers no longer with the colours. Like you I have long regarded the battle casualties as KIA, WIA and MIA, the latter possibly POW or straggled or deserted. But I have tended to wait until after battle to recover stragglers, which I have taken as 50%. However, if for any reason the army must abandon the field after the battle, (e.g. after a heavy defeat) then they recover just 1/3 of losses, the remaining 1/6 taken as POW.

    I find it easier this way to sustain a campaign without too much wastage. Mind you, we should expect more than we expect! In the 8-weeks of overland campaign beginning in May 1864, the Army of the Potomac lost something like 47% of the numbers it began with; the Army of Northern Virginia, half the size of the Union, about 55%. Of course, both sides received replacements from outside, though the CSA found such replacements hard to come by. In that time there were three major battles and several minor combats of verious significance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't consider stragglers either, they are unlikely to be back in action the same day. The rules basically allow for a temporary reduction in effectiveness whether its physical such as the guy who shoots off his ramrod, drops a flint or fires off all of his ammo or psychological, the guy who has frozen up with shock and fear or is going through the motions or firing in the air etc etc and the temporary effect of losing nco's etc.

      The rally rule means that some may be recovered during the battle while others are lost for the day. My rule of thumb is that no more than 1/2 of a unit's loss in figures are physically killed or wounded. Whether the rest are back in rank within a few minutes, over night or never is a whole other kettle of fish.

      Delete
  2. Are you going to put the refined rules on your blog ? , they sound interesting .

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is a link to the one page reference sheet on the MacDuff at Huzzah blog page
    or Click here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YCrPnfxitY72ll3nfVI3uqM_V8PhTB1RIjIMs2UU1_g/edit?usp=sharing

    The original Colonial set (1830's on) as published in the Courier is available via my rules page on the blog.

    I am still working on the updated combined set but had to put it aside until I sorted out the rejected changes and the accepted ones and then put it together. When it gets done they will be available through the blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I always find it interesting to read your thoughts on rules and design decisions - sounds like you are good at considering them in real world terms as well as in game terms.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Your games are some of the most uniquely presented that I have ever seen! I enjoy them a great deal!
    Keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  6. That`s an interesting game resolution. I find the One Hour Wargames great for producing balanced battles: though, sadly, is somewhat academic most of the time for me, as I almost invariably (every time) play games that are linked in some way to main campaign... therefore often unbalanced affairs. I`m loving that you are using casualty attrition alongside shaken troops and `lightly wounded` at the same time. Allowing for a greater depth of flexibility in our games, I feel.

    ReplyDelete